Showing posts with label Lily of St Leonards. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lily of St Leonards. Show all posts

Monday, 11 May 2015

Aims and Objectives


I have already said that I am going to continue blogging. I like writing and I like communicating ideas. We have important battles to fight in the future and indeed in the present.

This blog has a number of purposes.

1 To help protect and defend the UK

2 To defeat the aims and objectives of the Scottish National Party (SNP)

3 To provide a place where people from all sides can debate in a courteous and reasonable way.

I don’t have anything against people who support the SNP. I have no hatred in me at all for anyone, least of all for my fellow Scots. I disagree with them that is all. I use forceful argument and I attack ideas and assumptions, but I don’t attack people.
In the past few weeks I’ve been subjected to relentless personal attack. This has been quite hard. People who read this blog can help. You can leave supportive comments. You can tweet or retweet this blog. You can share it with friends and colleagues. This blog has grown from tiny beginnings and now is read by thousands every week. Help me to grow it and we will have a platform for putting forward our ideas.

If you would like to grow your own blog, do not hesitate to contact me. I will nearly always at the very least give you a tweet. I'm happy to give advice and help too. Maybe you have good ideas for me too. Let's share them. There is the possibility of going further. You could let me include one of my articles on your site, while I would consider letting you include one on mine. This helps both you and me by giving us back-links and additional ways to share what we are writing.

I have put in a huge amount of effort in writing this blog every week. You could support me by reading a few pages of one of my books. There are free preview pages. This might enable you to help me combat the negative trolling reviews I receive on Amazon because of my political opinions. A few positive, honest reviews would really be appreciated. Receiving just a little back makes a huge difference to my morale and contributes to my feeling that this blog is valued.  

As you no doubt have noticed this blog now has Adsense Google Ads plus Amazon Associates ads. I don't blog for money, I blog because I like writing and like people to read, but it is nice to earn just a little bit because of my writing. I hope you don't find the ads too intrusive. Who knows just like television maybe they are sometimes more interesting than the blog! 

I will occasionally include a non-political blog. This is partly because I want to write about more important things than Scottish nationalism. But also it is a way of growing the readership of the blog. Not everyone in the world is interested in Scottish politics. These articles will not be of interest to everyone. Sometimes they may get a bit technical. But please do have a look. Often they are more relevant than they might appear as they deal with ways of arguing.

Our battle is going to be difficult, but we can win if we are strong and united. I follow these principles.

1 Always do what your opponent least wants.
2 Don’t make concessions to nationalism.
3 Try to reverse the direction in which nationalism is taking us by making the UK more united.

We have a Pro UK government with an absolute majority. We can block the SNP for the next five years. There is nothing they can do about this.

We must do all we can to prevent the SNP gaining an overall majority at Holyrood.  

We must work towards reversing the gains the SNP made at the UK parliament.

The SNP will do all they can to win concessions that will gradually lead them towards independence. Resist these.

It is crucial that we understand the mentality of our opponent. They now want independence at any cost. No concession will make them cease to want their goal, but they will be content to accept such concessions as a step along the way. Even if we could show that something like Full Fiscal Autonomy (FFA) or indeed independence would make Scotland poorer, they would still want it and see it as well worth it. But unfortunately many independence supporters would continue to believe that FFA or independence would make them wealthier. They only believe their own sources of information now. So please don't even think of offering FFA, it would lead almost immediately to independence. I have thought very hard about this point. The only thing I fear now is FFA. 

We need to put forward a positive view of Britain and we need to come up with a fair, equal and lasting constitutional settlement that will secure the unity of our country forever. There are many possibilities. Personally I like the idea of devolving power to county level and beyond. This bypasses nationalism by bypassing national parliaments. Let the real power lie with Aberdeenshire not Edinburgh. But just as we devolve so must we unite. No country can survive long if its people lose their sense of unity. The encouragement of people from other parts of the UK will be decisive in securing Scotland remains a part of our country. If our fellow Brits turn against us because of the SNP, the SNP will have already won its battle. Don't let that happen. 

There is likely to be a referendum on the EU. This must not be allowed to undermine the UK still further. I intend to show soon how we can make this issue work to our advantage.

Be optimistic. Morale must be high as we have a long difficult battle ahead. Help me to develop our social media presence and we will have a better chance of seeing off those who want to destroy our country.

Best wishes,

Effie Deans


Sunday, 22 February 2015

Lily of St. Leonards, or, The complete works of Effie Deans

Someone suggested recently that it might be an idea if I gathered together all of my articles and published them in book form. I wondered at the time whether there was much point given that they are all freely available online. But on reflection I realised that a website is not easy to navigate when it becomes as large as mine. Anyway, I was intrigued by just how many pages I had written and just how many words. So I set about gathering everything together. What I present here is very lightly edited. When I began writing, I had a tiny readership and so I dashed off an article and simply published it without further thought. I spell poorly and remain largely indifferent to punctuation. Writing is simply a way of coming up with new ideas. As long as the idea is expressed clearly, then I could care less if a comma is missing or if it should rather be a semi colon.

This book has over hundred articles, is over 500 pages long and contains over 130,000 words. That’s a lot. It’s considerably longer than my dissertation. But then my blog has been read by considerably more people than all my academic work combined. What started out as a tiny band of readers who I met on twitter has built until now I have more readers than I ever expected.



Writing for me has always been first and foremost about being read. I like to share ideas. But it’s not only about that. It’s about developing a skill which every writer hopes will turn into something more. It’s about recognition and being valued. Some people train to be doctors, others lawyers. All of us when we work, expect some reward. My skill is writing. It’s really the only skill I have and I hope to develop it. It was for this reason that in the middle of the independence campaign I took a long break from blogging. I did some academic work and I worked on some fiction. When I stopped blogging, I did not know if I would start up again. I had lost the motivation to continue and had run out of ideas. I began also to think that the subject was not worth studying. Why devote so much time to such a paltry topic as Scottish nationalism?

Now I publish my complete works. But who is to say if they really are complete. There may be a second edition some time from now with many more articles. In the end, it is up to you. No publisher would publish a second edition if the first did not do well.

What I do is not free. It costs me a huge amount of time and effort. I wake up early in the morning on a Saturday and write. Sometimes I have no thought as to what new idea I can come up with that week, and then each week I wait to see how the idea will be understood. I’m not sure there is any more to write about this topic. This collection of articles contains every argument I can think of which might refute Scottish nationalism. Yet I also know that the fight must continue, for they are far from beaten.

I may well be back next week or the week after or in a few months. I’m drawn to the blog like a moth to a flame and write even when I ought not and when really I’m too tired and just need a break. I would be content with very little. If one out of every one hundred of my readers thought it was worth the price of a cup of coffee to see what one of my books was like, I would be absolutely delighted. People whose judgement I respect assure me that my work is worth reading. I would not make it available if it were not. If a newspaper offered to republish one of my articles I would be very proud and very grateful. I hope it is not too much to ask that there should be a little quid pro quo.

There’s a song I like very much about exile and parting

 ………………….my sad tears are falling,
To think that from Erin and thee I must part,
It may be for years, and it may be forever?
Then why art thou silent, thou voice of my heart?
It may be for years, and it may be forever;
Then why art thou silent, Kathleen, Mavourneen?

I am a long way from home and I don’t know when I’ll be coming back again. Scotland seems very far away, because it is far away. We have our own problems here in Russia and my energies must mainly be devoted to doing what I can here.

The foundation of everything I do is Christian existentialism and the philosophy of Søren Kierkegaard. He wrote a book called Either/Or.  In the end, everything comes down to a choice. And for that reason I’ve always been quite strict.  Either this book is the end, or it continues.  It’s a choice, but it’s not only my choice.


So it may be next week, or it may be forever. 




If you like my writing, you can find my books Scarlet on the Horizon (book, Kindle), An Indyref Romance (book, Kindle) and Complete Works (book, Kindle) on Amazon. I appreciate your support.


Saturday, 14 February 2015

An Indyref romance

The whole independence campaign, especially the last couple of weeks, was a shattering experience for me. There was absolutely nothing positive about the prospect of seeing my country break up, not least because I’d already been through that once before and knew first-hand about the traumas involved. I made tentative plans to leave a job I cannot afford to lose and a home, a landscape, that I love.  I felt joy at the result and relief, but my happiness was always edged with sadness at the damage done. That’s one reason I kept writing.

I wrote a number of blogs immediately after the result which tried to put the events into perspective. But I knew that I was missing something and that the format of a three page article was never going to express adequately what I wanted to say.  I wanted to capture the emotions, wanted a way to preserve what I’d gone through in the previous few months.

I began jotting down ideas in my notebook on the bus to work, started writing them up in the evenings and when I thought I had the beginnings of something, took some time off work to finish it. I always write very quickly or not at all. I either have a sense of "now I can go on" or I don’t. I had decided to write another novel. Everything followed from an initial idea. What if two young people from opposite sides of the debate fell in love?

A love story for me is the key plot device. There are also plots about war, espionage or other forms of conflict, but love is the key plot for everyday life. In each Walter Scott novel it is love that drives the story, even if it is incidental to what he is trying to say about some historical event or other. It is love that makes us turn the page even if later we forget who the lovers were and remember only the “minor” characters. I thought this romantic way of telling my story would also be a way for me to explore both sides of the issue, hopefully in a reasonably fair way, for I wanted sympathetic characters. In the end, in our country there are people we disagree with, but we are all human all too human and neither of my lovers are villains. I put myself in the novel, too as a sort of “minor” character and plot device. Anyone interested will find out lots about me, though it is worth remembering that the whole thing is made up even if it is grounded in my experience. It is the mingling of truth and fiction that enables us to say something in fiction that we cannot say in a blog. It was this that I had been looking for.


In the end, although my short novel is about last year it is also not about last year. My cover is a painting "Saint Cecilia and an Angel" by Orazio Gentileschi and Giovanni Lanfranco. I use it partly because I like it very much, but mainly because my book is about music and the attempt to find harmony when there appears to be only dissonance. Coming to understand a piece of music is like learning a new language. Lovers also need to find a new language especially when they disagree. They need to see through their dissonance in order to find their deeper harmony, or else they need to separate. So my book is partly about music. It also touches on influences such as Chrétien de Troyes, and Perceval’s search for what he has lost through his folly. This is the position that we are all sometimes left in. We have to look for what is gone when we do not even have a starting point for our search.

My characters are interested in some of the things that interest me. How could it be otherwise? They read what I have read, watch films that I have seen. There is something about Russia and Russian, even little bits about Dostoevsky. My characters differ not only with respect to politics, but also in their whole attitude to life, love morality and faith. The conflict in the story and the plot therefore is not merely about Scottish independence, but about whether it is possible to find harmony when people differ fundamentally. So while there is a romantic element to the story which drives the plot, I would hardly describe the book as some form of “chick lit.” People who have never read me sometimes make cracks about Mills and Boon, but my novels are written in a similar style to my blogs and for good or ill are what you would expect from someone who has been writing “Lily of St Leonards”.

 I’m now moving on from blogging to writing longer works. It will need practice. Anyone who has a glance at my blog index will find that my early blogs were not that good. The crucial thing is that I received enough encouragement to continue. Likewise I hope to write better novels. I’d like to write something about cults in Russia, both the cult of the Party and the cults that followed the collapse of everything everyone knew. I have already touched on this, but it’s an important story also for Scotland. I’d like to write something about the composer Messiaen and how he wrote his Quartet for the End of Time in a prison camp. I am uninterested in biography, but I am interested in using biography as a point of departure to explore what cannot be said, but which can sometimes be shown. I believe everything that is really vital falls into this category.

I’m going to use my blog now mainly to promote my other writing. If there is a pro-UK Scottish blogger who has written more than me, I’m unaware of them. I have built up a sizable audience every week and while the nationalists have blogs with a more devoted and extensive following than mine, I hope “our” quality allows "us" to make up for the fact that “we” lack the horde of devotees.  

I hugely appreciate those people who have already bought my book Scarlet on the Horizon. Some of them have been kind enough to get in touch and tell me that they enjoyed it. This sort of encouragement and support I value greatly. Thank you.

It takes an enormous effort to write a blog nearly every week. I try always to be original as I see no point simply repeating what’s already in the papers. At times over the past few months I have found the process exhausting. It’s not always easy to justify the time spent. My husband nags about my wasting time. It is easy, moreover, to sometimes feel that there is no point. Does reason any longer have a place in Scottish politics? I do not speak the language of upwards of half the population and I have no way of knowing where to look in order to try to learn it. The sense of the damage done has only increased as the nationalist half of Scotland has continued to follow their pied piper. It has all been profoundly dispiriting as well as faintly ludicrous. I feel like I’m in a rowing boat that has been swamped and all I have is teaspoon with which to bail it out.

At the moment I’m in Russia doing some research. My university has been very kind in allowing me some leave, partly because my relations here are struggling and my husband felt duty bound to try to help. The cost of some medicines has increased 400 fold. Food is very expensive. People are having their wages cut or losing their jobs. There are no food banks in Russia, but nobody starves, they do what is necessary to earn what they can. Also we’ve been through worse, much worse. The state was never much good for anything anyway, so people help each other. Family rallies round, friends help, even strangers help. I have gained a new sense of perspective being here again. The problems in Scotland and the complaints made by Scottish nationalists appear trivial and selfish.

I am grateful for every tweet and to everyone who gives their support by reading one of my books. There follows the back cover blurb and the first  chapter of An indyref romance.

Back soon I hope,

Effie


Blurb


In Aberdeen a few months before the Scottish independence referendum, Jenny just wants to get on with her studies. But she finds herself falling unexpectedly in love with Paul. This for the first time makes the debate real for her as she discovers that they have very different views about Scotland’s future and much else besides. They must discover a new way to dance together, learning a form of music which may yet allow them to find harmony in apparent dissonance. As they grow closer, the distance between their political views increases.  No longer able to avoid the debate Jenny secretly agrees to help her friend and tutor, Effie Deans, campaign for Britain.  Can her love for Paul survive their disagreement and can they forgive each other for being different?

Here is an inside account of what it was like during the campaign, but politics in the end becomes incidental to the story of a couple who must learn to share a new way of listening not only to the music they discover together,  but above all, to each other. Jenny’s journey will take her to Russia and, finally, back to the Aberdeenshire home of Effie Deans on the night of the referendum. Can Paul and Jenny find unity even in victory and defeat? Theirs is Scotland’s story.


Chapter 1

In early February 2014 two friends made their way to their favourite pub just of Union Street. They went there because it was the place most likely to serve what they called proper beer. Paul from the highlands had pretty much never tasted anything other than lager until he met Mark. But his Geordie friend had weaned him away from all things yellow by first buying him a bottle of “dog” known otherwise as Newcastle Brown Ale and moving on from there.  Paul still had the odd pint of lager when he was with other friends, but he also knew by then that however pleasant the taste of a pint of Heineken, it tasted much the same as a pint of Becks. There was nothing really to be interested in, while now as he looked at what was on offer this week at the Prince of Wales, he was delighted to see there was an ale he had never tasted before.
“I’m having one of those. Do you want one, too?” he said to his friend.
“Why not?”
It was about four on a Saturday afternoon and the pub was fairly full. It was their habit every now and again to have a couple there and then go for an Indian around five. Most restaurants were pretty much empty at that point, and you got faster service  and could hear yourself think. After that an early night, and they felt better the next day ready to study some more.  They were both in their final year at Aberdeen, Mark studying English, Paul studying French and politics. They’d both done averagely well up until now and so not that much depended on the next few months. There would be some exams, but not too many. Their result was already all but decided.
“You’re still determined to turn me into a foreigner, I suppose?” said Mark.
“You know fine I’m not,” said Paul.
“I know that you’d like to convince everyone of that.”
“We’re friends, good friends now, I think.”
“None better.”
“It’s not as if I’m anti-English then?”
“No, of course not.”
“I just think it’s the best chance for the left.”
“Most people are on the left where I come from, too. You know, we’re pretty much agreed on the politics. Just I want to see my country stick together and you want to see your country become independent.”
“But I’m British, too. I want to stay British, it’s just I want Scotland to decide everything, not some parliament where we’re outnumbered.”
“I doubt we’ll convince each other now,” said Mark. “But at least we don’t fall out about it. I’m not from Scotland and so in the end, it’s not my business. I’m not even sure I should vote.”
“Well, don’t expect me to give up trying to persuade you. It’s just you always seem to have a good argument. Where do you get them?”
“Some of them I think up for myself. I’m sure you do, too. But there’s a blog I discovered that I read. I rather like the style of it.”
“What’s it called?”
“Lily of St Leonards.”
“Effie Deans?
“That’s the one!”
“Do you think she’s real?”
“I know she is. She’s an academic here.”
“But her name is not listed. I’ve checked.”
“Wasn’t that a bit creepy of you?”
“Oh, someone online asked me, because I’m a student here.”
“She uses her Russian name officially. It’s some long monstrosity that you can’t even pronounce. But she still uses her maiden name in day to day business. It’s a heck of a lot easier for colleagues and students.”
“Have you met her?”
“I’ve seen her, but never really said anything. Jenny knows her though, and likes her a lot.”
They’d both known Jenny since they’d started at Aberdeen four years earlier. She was a tall, thin, blonde girl from Glasgow with a high-pitched, rather squeaky voice that they always compared to Minnie Mouse. Jenny was one of those girls who were rather shy, devout and who they both thought had never been kissed. She was average looking, pretty enough, but not someone you’d notice. She somehow seemed to lack the ability to attract. She lived in her own, rather splendid flat with Lorna and Susan who paid her, or rather her parents, some rent, though not the going rate. Mark had been with Susan for some years now. Paul had been chasing Lorna along with a lot of other men for over four years, and had got precisely nowhere.
“Have you decided to go the medic’s ball?” asked Mark.
“With whom?”
“I’d give up on Lorna if I were you.”
“I know. It’s been a pointless exercise for as long as I can remember.”
“You’re just another of her courtiers. She enjoys it very much indeed. But the enjoyment depends on sitting on her throne.”
“Has anyone made her descend from it?”
“Have you ever heard her mention someone from home?”
“A name crops up every now and again. Michael. Do you know he is?”
“I asked Susan if she knew. Michael is some chap ten years older than us. He’s not her boyfriend, but he’s the only one who is liable to become one. Lorna talks about him in a way she doesn’t talk about any other man. It’s like he’s on a throne and she’s the courtier. Same problem though. Just the other way round.”
“No much point asking Lorna then?”
“I don’t know if she’s going to the ball with anyone. Michael might take her, though I doubt it. He’s never even been here as far as I’m aware. But no, not much point. She might say ‘yes’, but she might well say ‘yes’ to half a dozen others. No not much point at all.”
“I’m not sure I can be bothered going at all then.”
“Why don’t you take Jenny?”
“Are you kidding?”
“You know her as well as I do. We’ve both spent enough evenings at her flat. She’s nice. She’s really nice.”
“Wouldn’t it be a bit like going to a ball with your sister?”
“Look, I’m here partly because of Susan. She asked me to talk to you. Jenny’s not a little girl. She has feelings. She likes you. She fancies you. She wants you to ask her. But she’ll never ask herself. You know she’s far too shy. How long is it since you’ve gone out with someone?”
“A couple of years, more really. I’ve been unlucky.”
“No, you’ve been chasing someone who doesn’t want you, while right beside her is someone who does. Besides, Jenny is a much better person than Lorna. I maybe know her better than you. She’s kind and gentle and capable of giving.”
“I’m not sure I could take the primness, the Christian Union nonsense.”
“You’d be taking her to a ball, not a church service.”
Paul thought of Jenny and of the dozens of occasions they’d all sat in the kitchen of her flat. He’d chatted to her loads of times, but he’d never been in her kitchen because of her and had almost never been alone with her for more than a few minutes. He tried to conjure her image into his mind and fleetingly was able to do so. He noticed an attractiveness that had not registered before. The fact that she wanted him was in itself attractive, indeed very attractive. Here was possibility while in the past couple of years had been only frustration and disappointment.
“Shall we visit them after the Indian? I wouldn’t want someone else to ask her before me?
“Why not ditch the Indian and go now?”
“I think, that wouldn’t be a bad idea”.
Half an hour later Paul, rather flippantly, said: “Jenny, you shall go to the ball.”
He saw her smile and exchange a glance with Susan. The glance seemed to say something like “Thanks.”
“Why don’t you two sit down and I’ll find something for you to eat?” said Jenny. “It’s so good of you to take me Paul, I’ve never been to a ball before.”
“Rather, it’s good of you to go with me after I asked you in that way. I’m really looking forward to it. I’m sure, we’ll have a great time together.




If you like my writing, you can find my books Scarlet on the Horizon (book, Kindle) and An Indyref Romance (book, Kindle) on Amazon. I appreciate your support.

Monday, 29 December 2014

Index

SNP, Lib Dems and Labour out (September 26, 2015)
One year on we must still fight for Britain (September 19, 2015)
Let’s make September 18th the UK’s national day (September 17, 2015)
If you think Tories are heartless, you should try socialists (September 13, 2015)
Only losers march (September 12, 2015)
The melting pot melts nationalism (September 4, 2015)
Why we are where we are in Scotland (August 29, 2015)
Dwelling in the land of Nod (August 28, 2015)
The love song of the dark lady : Epilogue (August 22, 2015)
The love song of the dark lady XIII (August 22, 2015)
The love song of the dark lady XII (August 20, 2015)
The love song of the dark lady XI (August 17, 2015)
The love song of the dark lady X (August 15, 2015)
The love song of the dark lady IX (August 14, 2015)
The love song of the dark lady VIII (August 12, 2015)
The love song of the dark lady VII (August 10, 2015)
The love song of the dark lady VI (August 8, 2015)
The love song of the dark lady V (August 7, 2015)
The love song of the dark lady IV (August 5, 2015)
The love song of the dark lady III (August 3, 2015)
The love song of the dark lady II (August 1, 2015)
The love song of the dark lady I (August 1, 2015)
Hare Alex, Hare Nicola : an introduction (August 1, 2015)
Despair is the sickness unto death (July 26, 2015)
#Brexit kills Scottish nationalism stone dead (July 25, 2015)
Nationalism is destroying the Eurozone (July 18, 2015)
Don’t import #Grexit into the UK (June 26, 2015)
We must find a common purpose in Scotland (June 6, 2015)
The debate about the EU must be about democracy (May 29, 2015)
Marriage has no purpose now (May 29, 2015)
Dazzling with an excess of truth (May 22, 2015)
The positive view of the SNP is only shared by insiders (May 22, 2015)
Throwing away the ladder (May 4, 2015)
It’s hatred of Tories that is destroying Labour in Scotland (May 3, 2015)
What's so great about Britain? (May 1, 2015)
This campaign of hatred must be turned off (April 30, 2015)  
Is there an ideal result for Scottish UK supporters? (April 4, 2015)
The road not taken (April 3, 2015)
Kierkegaard and The Exorcist (March 29, 2015)
Always do what your opponent least wants (March 28, 2015)
A lady of little faith (March 22, 2015)
One nation, indivisible (March 21, 2015)

The teleological suspension of the ethical and the great man theory of murder: Raskolnikov and Abraham as knights of faith or murderers
 (March 15, 2015)
An enemy of the people (March 14, 2015)
If God does not exist everything, is permitted (March 8, 2015)
On the Waterfront (March 7, 2015)
Either/Or (February 28, 2015)
Lily of St. Leonards, or, The complete works of Effie Deans (February 22, 2015)
Independence is becoming ever less likely (February 21, 2015)
An Indyref romance (February 14, 2015)
Things fall apart when the centre cannot hold (February 7, 2015)
The SNP is based on a distinction without difference (January 31, 2015)
Goodbye to all that (January 24, 2015)
“O rus!..” (January 1, 2015)
It's Scotland that needs rescuing now (December 27, 2014)
Failing to take No for an answer (December 20, 2014)
Tactical voting will defeat Salmond (December 13, 2014)
The social media campaign must start now (December 6, 2014)
Look where nationalism leads (November 30, 2014)
Scarlet on the Horizon, a novel by Effie Deans (November 29, 2014)
SNP plots have not been thought through (November 22, 2014)
What is devolution for? (November 15, 2014)
To remember you need to know what you're remembering (November 8, 2014)
There’s something rotten in the state of Scotland (November 1, 2014)
Nationalism has turned Scotland into a place of whisperers. (October 26, 2014)
Failing to move on after historical turning points leaves you on the wrong side of history(October 4, 2014)
Moving on, but with a glimpse backwards (September 27, 2014)
What we achieved (September 20, 2014)
To vote Yes would be worse than folly (September 13, 2014)
Don’t sell your birthright for a mess of nationalism. (September 6, 2014)
The foundation of nationalism is division (August 30, 2014)
Don't trust someone who would say anything to win independence (August 23, 2014)
It’s the SNP's attitude to democracy that worries me most (August 16, 2014)
Nationalist accusations of scaremongering are illogical (August 9, 2014)
Is there a democratic deficit in Scotland? (August 2, 2014)
Nationalist arguments depend on a strange misunderstanding of the word “country”(July 26, 2014)
A summary with two months to go (July 19, 2014)
A parable about wind (July 13, 2014)
A brand new UK is on offer if we vote No. (June 21, 2014)
Why an independent Scotland would face a demographic challenge (June 14, 2014)
A vote for independence is a vote for the SNP (June 7, 2014)
Would independence really help those living in poverty? (May 31, 2014)
Independence movements like UKIP and the SNP are enemies of the EU project (May 24, 2014)
Scotland does not need independence to be a country (May 17, 2014)
On the difference between a Scottish and British identity (May 10, 2014)
Independence and the choice about citizenship (May 3, 2014)
The description British nationalist is either trivial, offensive or false (April 26, 2014)
Is civic nationalism consistent with independence? (March 15, 2014)
Independence and the meaning of the word "foreign" (March 8, 2014)
To Alex Salmond on the occasion of his speech 4th March 2014 (with apologies to Mr J. Keats) (March 5, 2014)
The independence debate and the need for good neighbours (March 1, 2014)
A Doric declaration of independence (February 22, 2014)
The threat of independence (February 15, 2014)
Vote no If you want to keep the Tories out of Scotland (February 8, 2014)
The delusion of independence (February 1, 2014)
The SNP would destroy what the NHS stands for (January 25, 2014)
Expressing uncertainty is not scaremongering (January 19, 2014)
Do you have to feel British to support the UK? (January 1, 2014)
Why nationalist accusations of scaremongering are illogical (December 24, 2013)
You don't know what you've got til it's gone (December 15, 2013)
An appeal to our fellow Brits (December 7, 2013)
These people could win (November 30, 2013)
Is Scotland a nation? (May 19, 2013)
Do Independent countries have the right to their own currency? (May 5, 2013)
The Union is an accident of history (April 21, 2013)
Could an independent Scotland avoid austerity? (April 7, 2013)
Independence weighed in the balance (March 31, 2013)
The benefits of independence (March 24, 2013)
The difference between a compatriot and a foreigner (March 10, 2013)
The implications of independence (February 23, 2013)
Should England have its own parliament? (February 16, 2013)
A tale of two referendums (February 2, 2013)
Is Unionism a form of nationalism? (January 26, 2013)
Is the utility of Scottish independence pragmatic? (December 15, 2012)
Taking wings from reality, or, nationalism's failure to understand the concept of both/and (December 8, 2012)
A sense of Scottish identity does not require independence (December 8, 2012)
Are the SNP the heirs to Michael Foot? (December 1, 2012)
A positive case for unionism (November 17, 2012)
On remembering what Scots fought for (November 11, 2012)
The SNP threatens unionism not only in Scotland (November 4, 2012)
Scottish independence would delight our enemies and dismay our friends (October 25, 2012)
On the North-South divide and the secession of South Britain (October 13, 2012)
Self-determination and the Union (October 6, 2012)
Can Scots bear to live in the same country as the English? (October 6, 2012)
Failing to face up to the logic of independence (October 6, 2012)
What if Scotland had voted for independence in 1997? (October 6, 2012)
The unfulfilled promises of independence (October 6, 2012)
Why independence is not a matter for children (October 6, 2012)
What Scots could lose with independence (October 6, 2012)
Scottish Independence: a question of identity (October 6, 2012)
The argument for independence depends on a linguistic anomaly (October 6, 2012)
A choice between two unions (October 6, 2012)
Scotland, debt and subsidy (October 6, 2012)
A dilemma for left-wing nationalists (October 6, 2012)
How the unionist campaign can attract support (October 6, 2012)
A fundamental flaw in a nationalist truth (October 6, 2012)
Why Scottish nationalism is founded on ancestry (October 6, 2012)
Understanding the 1980s is the key to understanding Scottish politics today (October 6, 2012)
Why Scottish unionists should be concerned about English nationalism (October 6, 2012)
What the history of the SNP tells us about nationalism (October 6, 2012)
Why monetary union may not survive independence (October 6, 2012)
Scotland and home rule (October 6, 2012)
Why I'm not a nationalist (October 6, 2012)
The two kinds of Scottish nationalist (October 6, 2012)
What has the union ever done for us? (October 6, 2012)
Is there a contradiction between euroscepticism and unionism? (October 6, 2012)
Salmond wants independence in the UK (October 6, 2012)
How the SNP uses Anglophobia to split the union (October 6, 2012)
SNP and the development of newspeak (October 6, 2012)
Why “devo-max” is the greatest threat to the union (October 6, 2012)
Counter Arguments to YesScotland (October 6, 2012)
A tale of two SNPs (October 6, 2012)
The one thing that the the EU lacks is the one thing that the UK has. Why would we give it up? (October 6, 2012)
Self-determination and the Union (October 6, 2012)