I don’t want Mrs Sturgeon to click her ruby slippers
together while repeating endlessly that there’s no place like Scotland. Nor is
it helpful to once more hear nationalists repeat clichés like “A hard Tory
Brexit makes independence inevitable.” But it might be useful to revisit
Scottish independence in the light of what we have all learned since the decision
to leave the EU.
1. If there were a second referendum on Scottish
independence, it would not be a Yes/No question.
Scottish nationalists still think that they would
have the advantage of campaigning for Yes, but this would reverse the precedent
set by the Electoral Commission to make the EU referendum a Remain/Leave
question. Obviously any future Scottish independence referendum with a Yes/No question
would be challenged legally.
2. In order to win Scottish independence, the SNP
would have to win four times.
In order to have a legal referendum on independence,
the SNP will have to gain another pro-independence majority in the Scottish
Parliament (i).
They will then have to win a vote to Leave the UK
(ii).
They will then have to win a second referendum to
Leave the UK after the terms of deal negotiated with the UK become clear to the
Scottish public (iii).
It has already been established both by the actions
of the SNP after the 2014 independence referendum and the Remain campaign after
the 2016 EU referendum that campaigning for a second referendum is legitimate.
They will then have to win a vote in the UK’s
Parliament (iv), although it will never be possible for the SNP to have more
than 59 seats there.
It has been shown recently that the UK Parliament
may if it chooses reject the result of a legal referendum. No-one questions that
it would be legal for the UK Government to decide to water down leaving the EU
to such an extent that it would be Brexit in name only. It would likewise be
within the power of the Government to reverse Article 50.
Therefore the UK Government could decide that
Scottish voters did not understand independence or that the SNP exaggerated the
benefits and minimised the costs. Perhaps the SNP would have a bus that claimed
Scots would be better off by £1000 per year after independence. Perhaps they
would make some other claim that turned out to be false in the period after the
vote. Well this could be used by the Remain dominated Parliament in Westminster
to argue that the Scottish Leave vote was illegitimate.
3. The slogan “Independence in Europe” involves a
contradiction.
If the UK cannot leave the EU without surrendering
to a Carthaginian peace, not leaving at all or leaving without a deal, then
what sort of independence would Scotland have in the EU? If Scotland could
never leave the EU once we joined, then we would have the independence of a
prisoner.
Some Scottish nationalists would be quite happy to
surrender their hard won sovereignty to Brussels just so long as we are not
ruled by London. But this is to apply the logic of “anyone but England” to
matters rather more serious than football.
4. Being in a different trade bloc to your closest
economic partner makes no sense.
Even after nearly 100 years of independence the
Irish economy is hugely dependent on trade with the UK. Being in a different
trade bloc to the UK will damage trade between the UK and Ireland and may lead
to tariffs. This would still more be the case in the event of Scotland becoming
independent. The Scottish economy is closely integrated with the other parts of
the UK, but this could not survive if the UK were outside the EU while Scotland
chose to join. Even if Scotland didn’t join the EU there would still need to be
trade negotiations between the UK and Scotland. Anyone who thinks trade
negotiations are straightforward hasn’t been paying attention. After all, the
UK hasn’t haven’t reached them yet with the EU. We can’t even agree on the
divorce terms.
5. Borders are not simply lines on a map
The negotiations over the Irish backstop show that
keeping open a border between a non-EU country and the EU is complex at best,
impossible at worst. Technology may allow tariffs to be collected and migration
to be monitored. But it is proving difficult enough when Ireland is not in
Schengen. How much more difficult would it be if Scotland were forced to join
Schengen. It is after all a condition of EU membership.
6. You can’t always get what you want
Scotland would have to simultaneously negotiate
trade deals with both the EU and the UK. This would be the case whether or not
Scotland chose to join the EU. If the UK is able in the future to make trade
deals with other countries like USA, Australia and New Zealand, these deals
would not automatically apply to Scotland and so would have to be negotiated too.
The key lesson we have learned in the past two years
is that the EU has used the negotiation process to try to prevent the UK from
leaving. We have been offered a deal that is worse than remaining. What would
prevent the UK doing the same to Scotland? What would prevent the UK working
together with Pro UK Scots, Remainers, to thwart Scottish independence and make
the price of that independence so high that Scots would be left in the position
of having to accept either Scottish independence in name only or a “No deal”
with tariffs and border controls between Gretna and Berwick? If it is
legitimate for the EU to act in this way why couldn’t the UK Government do
likewise? No doubt there would be lots of goodwill towards Scotland, after all
none of us can remember any Scots saying anything nasty about our neighbours,
but what if that goodwill began to evaporate as the divorce ran into difficulty
and disagreement?
So what did you learn Nicola? Up until now your
answer to ever question has been independence. The Emerald City lies on the
horizon and if only we could get there we would find it was in fact the Sapphire
city with a Saltire flying from its highest point. In the Wizard’s bag we would
each find what we needed and the Yellow Brick Road would turn out to be paved
with gold. But Scottish nationalism is not going to get there if it continues
to think in clichés. There are hard questions to answer and they are getting
harder. The hardest of all is this.
We have learned that a referendum decides nothing
whatsoever. The losers just keep on campaigning as if nothing had happened and
fight to overturn the result. The logic of this though is that that there never
will be another referendum in the UK. Did you learn that lesson Nicola? If so,
how do you achieve independence?