Friday, 10 August 2018

Tolerance must tolerate even mockery or else be intolerance


Like everyone else I tend to avoid writing about Islam. The events of the past week show why. Many people still care deeply about religion even if Britain is for the most part secular. We live in a country with people from many backgrounds and with very different beliefs. We have to try to get on. The very least that is required is that we should try to be polite and kind. But I believe that honest debate can help us to reach a better understanding and that failure to write openly and self-censorship may lead to an increase in misunderstanding rather than a decrease.


I have only rarely seen someone wearing a niqāb and still more rarely seen a burqa. I’ve seen lots of women wearing head scarfs and quite a few wearing clothing that covers pretty much everything except their hands and face. I must admit that I get a bit of a shock when I see someone covering their face. It may well be irrational, but I also feel a slight sense of fear. I’m sure it requires far more bravery to walk about with a veil. She is more likely to receive nasty comments or worse than I am, so I wouldn’t be surprised if both of us are feeling a bit of fear. I have never asked. I’ve never had the slightest interaction with someone wearing a veil. I don’t suppose I ever will.

Why do some women wear veils? I think in order to understand this we have to go back to the history of the three major monotheistic religions, Christianity, Judaism and Islam.

Judaism is a religion of law. The rules of Jewish life were set forth in books like Leviticus and developed by means of the constant interpretations generations of rabbis made about these books. But Judaism was also a religion that passed onto subsequent generation by means of family rather than by means of conversion. Although the example of Ruth the Moabite showed that it was possible to convert to Judaism, it was never easy. For this reason Judaism tended not to spread and whatever rules it had only applied to its own people. Moreover, because in the history of Judaism Jewish people were rarely the lawmakers, it was usually easy for Jews to cease to follow the rules and become secular.

The essential difference between Christianity and Judaism is that it spread by means of conversion and subsumed the multiplicity of Jewish law into the straightforward and simple “Love God and love your neighbour”. It is for this reason that Christ could pick grain on the Sabbath and in this way demonstrate to his followers that they no longer had to worry about the rules in Leviticus. They could eat what they please, more or less, drink what they please and didn’t have to worry about how to cook things, how to dress or how to wash.

Islam is both a religion of law and a religion that spreads by means of conversion. There are many rules by which Muslims must live. Some of these are derived from the Koran [al-Qurʾān] others from the various writings that came subsequently e.g. Hadith and Sunnah.  Many of these rules are similar to the ones that Jewish people follow such as not eating pork, others are different such as the rules about not drinking alcohol and the rules about praying. The difference however between Judaism and Islam is that whereas Jewish people only wished to apply their rules to other Jews, Muslims owing to their desire to convert others to their faith wished to apply their rules to non-Muslims. For this reason in Muslim countries, there is a tendency to apply Islamic law not merely to Muslims, but to everyone else because Islamic law is universal.

Are Muslim women obliged to wear a veil? This is where things become a little more complex. Muslims differ in their interpretation not so much of the Koran, but of the Hadith and Sunnah and the various other traditions that have developed during the past centuries. The result is that in some Muslim countries women don’t even feel obliged to wear a head scarf, in others they are required to show nothing but their eyes (niqāb), sometimes not even that (burqa).

How should a secular society respond? The crucial point I believe we must make is to say that Islamic law does not apply here. In all of Britain no one is forbidden from drinking alcohol, eating pork or required to cover their face. But anyone who chooses to follow Islamic rules must be free to do so.

But what do we do about people who feel forced by their family or community to follow rules that they otherwise would not wish to. Here we must make clear to everyone that it is the right of every British citizen not to be forced to marry, not to be forced to wear a veil, or anything else for that matter, and not to be forced to have parts of their anatomy mutilated. Even if various traditions and various interpretations of religious law require these things, British law requires that the citizen must not be forced.

For this reason, women from any religious background must be able to tell someone that they are being coerced by their family or community to do something that they don’t want to do and then gain the protection of the British state so as to prevent this coercion.

British Muslims must have the same rights as any other Brits. So long as they wish to follow Islamic law and doing so is compatible with British law they should be free to follow whichever religious rules they please. But if they should choose to cease to believe in Islam or if they should wish to get drunk in a pub or if indeed they should wish to run down the street naked instead of wearing a veil then the full force of UK law should protect them.

We should respect all religions, but that does not mean we have to agree with them or feel unable to criticise aspects that we disagree with. Religions are not all the same.  Some core religious beliefs are incompatible. To believe one to be true is to believe that others are false. Likewise, people must be free to believe that all religions are false.

Just as most British people feel free to criticise aspects of Christianity that they disagree with, so we must all feel free to criticise aspects of Islam that we disagree with. In order to respect someone you have to treat them the same as everyone else. Someone who is willing to criticise the Catholic Church’s attitude to abortion, but unwilling to criticise Muslim practices with regard to veiling obviously thinks that Muslims are less able to debate rationally than Catholics. This strikes me as far more racist than treating British Muslims simply as our equals.

We live in a society where we are free to mock the Book of Mormon, the Spanish Inquisition and the crucifixion itself because we think that Mormons and Christians will probably have a sense of humour and even if they don’t they must tolerate satire and even mockery. We should expect no less of Muslims.



13 comments:

  1. Solid commonsense, which is sadly thin on the ground these days...

    ReplyDelete
  2. We should ban muslim immigration because unlike the other religions Islam is a prosleystising faith and will seek to convert us if it is allowed to grow in numbers. In many ways, Islam is not really a religon more of a political cult as even Winston Churchill once acknowledged and his ccomments on the subject would now get him thrown into a British prison under the tyrannical globlalist liberal-left Tory Party. As for the Burka etc, we SHOULD ban them being worn in sensitive security enviroments like airports but apart from that then people have the right to wear anything they wish.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ... '*unlike* the other religious faiths ...' !!!

      Delete
  3. Johnsons comments were racist. End of. The man is a moron, wants only power to better himself and nobody else. Onky fools would follow such a man of no substance. Good luck UK, for you are royally screwed with this idiot and brexit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. But islam is not a race , if i walked into a bank wearing a ski mask it would fill the place with fear likewise if i tried to board a plane . Why should we tolerate a religion that is so intolerant of others ?

      Delete
    2. Making comments about burkas is not racist. Islam is a socio-political ideology that masquerades as religion and its adherents come from no specific race of people now...it is practised in over 60 countries with very varied ethnicities. Just because a form of dress is associated with one ideology should not exempt it from adverse comment or indeed humorous comment. No other faith screams blue murder and then actually commits murder when it is criticised or is the object of humour. No other faith tries to convert all to its laws against all reason or need. No other faith condemns to death those who leave it. No other faith oppresses women as badly. In the west we are supposed to have free speech and therefore though I personally dislike Boris Johnson I think this witch hunt against him for a few amusing remarks about burkas is the last straw in our descent into a police state that favours Islam above free speech - it appals me that we cannot speak our personal views any more without fear of being vilified.

      Delete
    3. The evidence is that Boris Johnson, as grotesque as his conduct may be, is no moron.

      Delete
    4. I agree with you Unknown. We, in Britain, have lost any real freedom of speech and now only PC things can be said about Islam and its true nature.


      i also agree with Simon Neville in that Boris Johnson is no moron though he comes across like that at times. I would say that Boris Johnson is very calculting man and a Dr Jekyell and Mr Hyde type character. Personally, I don't think he is suitable to be PM of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland though saying that I hope the Tories wake-up damm quick and get rid of Teresea Maybe/Mayhem as she is clearly way out of her depth as PM and is just an intenrnational embarrasment to this country. If the Conservatives go into the next election with her at the helm they are TOAST!

      Delete
  4. '... in the history of Judaism Jewish people were rarely the lawmakers ...' !!!
    This will come as a surprise both to Jews and to anybody having the slightest acquaintance with legal history. The magnificent achievements of Jewish Law merit study by any humane person. I would respectfully [stet] recommend to Effie, before she holds forth on this topic again, that she look at the history of the right to silence. (The famous case of Miranda v Arizona is a useful starting-point.)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Several interesting questions arise from this discussion. First of all, why are some of us so obsessed with the attire of so few of the women in this country?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Secondly, why does a certain class of person object to *any* kind of garment denominated as I Islamic?

      Delete
    2. Thirdly, why does a subset of this class find it necessary to shout abuse at women wearing such a garment?

      Delete
    3. Fourthly, why does a species amongst this genus experience an irresisible urge to attack such women?

      Delete