There is something dispiritingly similar about Irish nationalism and Scottish nationalism. This is no doubt because the one frequently supports the other. Most Scottish nationalists would cheer if Irish nationalism achieved its goal of uniting Ireland, while I strongly suspect quite a lot of Irish people would delight in seeing Britain partitioned. It is rather contradictory to think that uniting one island is good while partitioning another is also good, but then again if your main goal is getting even with the Brits you just don’t much care if it happens by means of uniting or dividing.
Cú Chulainn brings peace and democracy to ancient Ulster by means of rustling cattle |
The Republic of Ireland has a long term goal of uniting Ireland. I think it would be better if they left this up to the people actually living in Northern Ireland. Personally I regret that Ireland was ever partitioned, but it was a direct consequence of Ireland seeking independence from the UK. If the Irish had decided to remain in the UK, their island would not have been partitioned. This is self-evidently true, but stating it immediately leads to hostility from both Irish and Scottish nationalists.
It might or might not have been possible to force
what became Northern Ireland to leave the UK along with the South. But the
majority of people living in Northern Ireland at the time did not want to leave the UK. The British army could perhaps have forced
them to join the South, but then again it could equally have forced
the South to remain in the UK. Partition was not an ideal solution. It led to decades of
terrorism. But would forced Irish unity have led to peace?
Anyway we are where we are. I would have no
objection at all if the majority of people in Northern Ireland ever chose to join
the Republic, but let’s leave it up to them rather than try to force the
issue by turning the border in Ireland into a way of loosening the ties between
Northern Ireland and the other parts of the UK.
The Irish PM has been pushing his luck lately. The
Republic of Ireland has a national interest in trying to maintain a close trading
relation with the UK. We would like the same. But there may come a time when
ordinary British people lose patience with the Irish. We have, on the whole,
remained friendly towards you. We have been happy to buy your beef, your
butter and your beer. But we don’t have to do so. We have a national interest
too. We are trying to leave the EU in such a way that we can maintain an open
border in Ireland, maintain more or less free trade with all EU members, while
regaining our sovereignty and the right to make trade deals with the rest of
the world. If the Irish are seen to be trying to damage the UK national
interest, there may well come a point when ordinary Brits cease being quite so
friendly and may discover that we can buy what we need from elsewhere.
The essence of the problem between Ireland and the UK
is that while the Brits tend to look kindly on Ireland, the Irish tend to view
Britain with hostility. It is this that is fundamentally behind the
diplomatic difficulties at the moment. If there were good will, the border
would not cause much of a problem, but there is very little good will at all
coming from the Republic.
The reason for this was very ably illustrated to me
the other day, when I pointed out on Twitter that if it had not been for the
Brits, the Irish today would be speaking a language (Irish), that could be
understood nowhere outside of Ireland apart from perhaps in the Outer Hebrides.
This was met with fury, even though it is self-evidently true. Irish people overwhelmingly speak English as natives, because for many centuries they were
ruled from London. If you don’t think it’s an advantage to speak English as a
native speaker, then by all means cease doing so. It wouldn’t bother me in the
slightest if the whole population of Ireland spoke Irish and only Irish, but it
might hinder your trade rather more than Brexit.
No doubt great wrongs were done in Ireland. But
frankly great wrongs were done in Britain too and throughout Europe. The nobles
conquered and the peasants suffered. Kingdoms expanded and contracted. Wars
were fought. But you weren’t the only
victims. It wasn’t Irish people alone in Europe who suffered from famine. The
ordinary Brit had no more say in who ruled him than the ordinary Irish person.
Each could die for a stupid reason or because it was the whim of someone more powerful.
We are not at a fault for every bad thing that ever happened in Ireland. Get over it. No-one now was alive when the New Model Army crushed you. We don't even blame present day Germans for the sins of their grandparents, but you would blame us for what happened between 1649 and 1653 as if it happened yesterday.
Lots of Brits moved to Ireland during the period
when we were joined together. But then again in prehistoric times Brits were the first settlers in
Ireland, and you repaid us the compliment by first sending the Scoti to settle in Scotland and
then during the nineteenth century moving here en masse. Many Scots moved to
Ulster in the seventeenth century and their descendants still form a majority
there. But if Scottish Protestants were planted in Ulster, is it equally
correct to say that Irish Catholics were planted in Glasgow or Boston? We have
been moving between our two islands since history began. When do we have
plantation and when do we have the benefits of migration?
The failure of Irish nationalism is that it could
never take with it the whole of Ireland. The reason for this is that it has
zero appeal for Ulster Protestants, for the simple reason that they are still
treated as if their presence is unwelcome. They are still settlers more than
three hundred years after they settled. The Irish treat unionists as if they
arrived on the Windrush fifty years ago and should jolly well go home. Until
the Irish cease to hate the Brits they will have no chance whatsoever of having
a united peaceful Ireland because those Brits live in Northern Ireland and why
would they want to be part of a state where they are hated?
What have the Brits ever done for us? Well out of
all of the most notable Irish people I can think of the vast majority were
descendants of the British. That is what we did for you, even though you hate
us for doing it.
St. Patrick (5th cent.) came to Ireland from Roman Britain. He
was therefore a Brit. He gave you Christianity and you celebrate his doing so
every March 17th forgetting that the man who got rid of your snakes was not actually Irish.
Bishop George Berkeley (1685-1783) the great
idealist philosopher was from Ireland, but he wasn’t just from Ireland, he was
Anglo-Irish. What this means is that he was a Protestant and was a descendant
of people who were planted in Ireland.
Robert Boyle (1627-1691), the first modern chemist gave us Boyle's law, but the law equally well expressed the fact that eminence in Ireland invariably was a consequence of being both Anglo and Irish.
The greatest general in Irish history Arthur Wellesley (1769-1852) was born in Ireland, but reckoning that if a man was born in a
stable it didn’t make him a horse declined to consider himself Irish. Still he
was at least as Irish as the vast majority of great Irish people, far more so than any number of American Presidents who find it convenient to discover, or else make up, some Irishness in their family tree.
If you go through a list of the greatest Irish
writers, beginning with Jonathan Swift (1667-1745), continuing with Oscar Wilde
(1854 – 1900), George Bernard Shaw (1856 – 1950), W.B. Yeats (1865-1939), C.S.
Lewis ( 1898 – 1963), Samuel Beckett (1906-1989), Iris Murdoch (1919 – 1999)
etc. etc., you will find that nearly all of them are Anglo Irish. In fact the
only significant Irish literature that is not Anglo-Irish literature is either
written in a language that almost no-one can understand, (e.g. Táin Bó Cúailnge), or is written by James Joyce in a language that quite literally no-one understands
(e.g. Finnegan’s Wake).
Modern roads in Ireland were designed by the British, so too were the railways. We gave you the games that the world now plays (Football, Rugby Cricket), otherwise you would have been left merely playing with yourselves (Hurling, Gaelic Football). The most famous Irish products such as Guinness were created by the Anglo-Irish. Even those Irish politicians who campaigned most effectively for Irish independence such as Charles Stewart Parnell (1846-1891) were doing so precisely because they were Anglo-Irish and had been brought up in the British political tradition.
Prior to Irish independence in fact it is hard to
find anyone of consequence from Ireland who was not at least partly British.
These people for the most part thought of themselves as being British. They saw
no particular difference between themselves and those living in Britain. There, in fact, wasn't much of a difference apart from an accent and the separation of the Irish sea. We gave up hating people because they were Protestant or Catholic sometime in the eighteenth century. Unfortunately you didn't, for which reason we received sectarianism as your gift. It's the thing that most distinguishes those who have Irish descent from those who don't.
None of the great Anglo-Irish people would have existed, at least
they would not have existed in Ireland, unless British people had moved there because
it was part of Britain. Hating Britain amounts therefore to hating the best
that you produced.
Perhaps this is why you hate us. It must be tough to
take when you find out that almost no-one of exclusively Irish descent was of
any consequence whatsoever in the long course of Irish history. You all speak
English, yet you hate us for teaching you to do so. We built your cities, brewed your beer and allowed you to come here to work when there was no more work in
Ireland, but still you blame us for everything.
Not only this, Ireland in the 1920s had free markets,
the rule of law and a functioning democracy with a civil service that was more or
less free from corruption. It had these things only because it had been part of
the political development of the British Isles that gave us all these
traditions. None of these things existed in Ireland prior to British involvement.
You didn’t have any sort of democracy before the arrival of the Brits, you
had no free markets and no freedom. You had only despotism
and barbarousness. Irish civilisation happened because of Irish history, which includes the fact that for many centuries we were united. Even in Europe today
let alone the rest of the world there are few places that are as prosperous, free
and democratic as Ireland and the UK. None of this was automatic. It happened
because of our shared political traditions, which were spread from Britain to
all of the Anglosphere.
My family were from Ireland. Some of them are still
there. My grandfather was Anglo-Irish and he found it rather tough to remain in
the land of his birth because of the prejudice he encountered at the time of Irish independence. But he didn’t blame Ireland for anything, rather he always loved it. He made a successful
life here in Britain. You see, when you spend your whole life blaming someone
else it give you a wonderful excuse for failure. If you give someone a
reason to fail by always blaming someone else, do not be
surprised when they grasp at failure and embrace it. It is this above all else that
hinders Ireland.
Britain remained friendly towards Ireland even when
you bombed us, even when you blame us and even when you hate us. Blaming us for
everything damages you, not us. We moved on a long time ago. We find your
hatred rather baffling, but we are used to it and quite indifferent to it. Most
Brits no longer even notice you (did they really elect Dame Edna to be their Prime Minister? we shrug quite unaware of whether Fine this or Fine that or indeed Fine Fair is the party that you chose).
But your hatred of Britain damages not merely your relations with the UK. It means that you can’t quite join the Anglosphere. The “five eyes” of Canada, UK, USA, NZ and Australia, have a trust and friendship that means we cooperate in security. But Irish hatred of Britain means we could never quite trust you. To whom would you divulge a shared secret just to get back at the land that gave birth to Cromwell? It's you that loses from this, not us.
But your hatred of Britain damages not merely your relations with the UK. It means that you can’t quite join the Anglosphere. The “five eyes” of Canada, UK, USA, NZ and Australia, have a trust and friendship that means we cooperate in security. But Irish hatred of Britain means we could never quite trust you. To whom would you divulge a shared secret just to get back at the land that gave birth to Cromwell? It's you that loses from this, not us.
Accept who you are. Every Irish person is to a lesser or greater extent a mix of the British and the Irish. Hating the British is simply a rather odd way of hating yourself.
The chippiness on the Irish shoulder has damaged
relations between our islands for too long. Most Brits have Irish ancestors,
most Irish have Brits in their family tree. We are the most closely related
countries in Europe. Let us work together and accept that for all our faults we
are what we are because of each other. If we could overcome the hostility we
might just find a mutually beneficial way of living together.