Quebec had a referendum on
secession from the rest of Canada in 1995. Fortunately
thousands and thousands of Canadians from the rest of the country demonstrated.
They had a simple message. One hundred thousand people attended a “Unity
rally” making a plea to the Québécois. It amounted to the following: “Please
don’t go. We want you to stay.” The result of the referendum was close. 50.58%
voted no to secession while 49.42% voted yes for independence. One of the
reasons that the result was so close was because the yes campaign had promised
things that were not in their gift such as the retention of the the Canadian
Dollar and the maintenance of an economic and political partnership with the
other Canadian provinces. Even though the rest of Canada had made it clear that
they were unlikely to agree to Quebec’s wish list, a
significant number of Québécois believed that they could have their
secessionist cake and eat it no matter what their fellow Canadians thought. The
secessionists nearly won. What prevented their victory may well have been the
response of their fellow Canadians. The support for unity may well have made
the difference. The mood in the rest of Canada was decisive.
Imagine if there were a lunch club. Four people
meet once a month to chat and share a meal together. Imagine if one member of
the club was getting tired of it all, perhaps concerned at the expense and
thought she would be better off eating alone. What would happen if the other
three said something like “Good riddance, we didn’t much like you anyway”?
Would this make it more or less likely that the person thinking of leaving
would go? On the other hand, what if the others all presented a united view
saying “Please don’t go, we would miss you so”?
Up until now the English, Welsh and Northern
Irish haven’t played much of a role in the debate about Scottish independence.
But we in Scotland who support the UK really need the support
of our fellow citizens. Just like in Canada it could make the
difference.
Of course, politicians in the other parts of the
UK have generally shown
that they are in favour of the Union. But it’s not so much the support of
politicians that we need as the support of ordinary people. Unfortunately some
of our fellow countrymen appear to welcome the secession of Scotland. I don’t know how
representative they are, but I do know that they harm the case for the UK. Naturally, it’s an
understandable reaction to the threat of divorce. When a husband says he wants
a divorce it hurts and the natural response is to say “Good riddance, I never
much loved you anyway”. But what if the wife were to say “Please don’t go I
would miss you so.”? Would such a response make it more or less likely that the
husband would stay?
But how can we in Scotland persuade the other parts
of the UK that divorce is not the
answer? One way might be to appeal not only to their patriotism as our fellow
Brits, but also to their reason in terms of what is best for Britain including
what is best for themselves..
We’re just beginning to come out of the worst
recession since the 1930s. The UK has a single market,
which is the result of our being in a union for hundreds of years. Gradually
the fact that we have all lived in the same state has brought about
harmonization. More or less the same laws apply to all of us. Business
practices are similar. The experience of living in one part of the UK is not that different
from living in another, which means that people move about freely and easily.
Having a single market is of enormous economic benefit. It is one reason why
the United States is so successful
economically. Scottish independence is bound to have a disruptive effect on the
UK single market and
gradually as Scottish laws and practices diverged from the rest of the UK (rUK) the disruption would
increase. The one argument that convinces me that it may be in our interest to
remain in the EU is the existence of the EU single market. If the UK were to leave we would
not have all of the benefits of membership of that market. But even those benefits
are not nearly as great as the benefits of a single country’s single market.
The single market within Germany is much closer and more
harmonious than the single market between Germany and France. So while an
independent Scotland would no doubt maintain
a close economic relationship with rUK, it would not be as close as at present.
It would be more like the relationship between Germany and France than the relationship
between Bavaria and Saxony.
Does this matter? Well actually it does. The UK’s economic recovery is
fragile. There is a lot to do before the economy will be on a really firm
footing. The one thing none of us need is disruption to the UK single market, even if
that disruption were to be relatively slight. Markets hate uncertainty.
Businesses like to be able to plan. But what would divorce proceedings bring if
not uncertainty. Suddenly a three hundred year old marriage that everyone the
world over took for granted would be about to end. Other separatist movements
in Spain or Belgium would take heart.
Perhaps the Québécois would try again. Would these divorce proceedings make the
recovery in Britain, more or less likely to
continue? Would the world economy be grateful to the Scottish nationalists for
their contribution to stability and confidence? It seems unlikely.
Because we have lived in one country for so many
years, we’re all rather mixed up together. So are our businesses and services.
What’s more there are three hundred years of law and practice to disentangle.
What do you think our politicians would be doing in the event of Scottish
independence? On both sides of the border they would be spending nearly all of
their time on the divorce proceedings. Think about how difficult it has been
for successive Governments to change longstanding institutions like the House
of Lords or to bring improvement or reform to public services. Sometimes
successive Governments of different parties have tried, often in vain, to make,
for instance, the Civil service more efficient. We know that it is difficult and
time consuming to bring about change. Does anyone then think that dissolving a
three hundred year relationship will be straightforward?
The reason why this is important is that what we
really need is for our politicians to be focussing on bringing growth to our
country. Instead they would be involved in arcane constitutional matters
concerning Scottish independence, the division of assets and liabilities and
trying to find a way to disentangle three hundred years of living together like
a family. Does anyone think that if our politicians focus on these matters
rather than the economy, this will be of benefit to any of us in terms of
prosperity? No one knows how the independence negotiations would go. No
one knows whether they will be easy and harmonious or hard and acrimonious. But
everyone can agree that to some extent at least they will be disruptive and
this will have an effect on all of us wherever we live in the UK at present. They are
just what none of us need while our fragile economic recovery is beginning.
I would ask my friends in the other parts of the
UK the following question.
Do you think we will be more or less secure if our armed forces and security
services are divided? The Royal Navy would no longer be patrolling our northern
shores. So your northern flank would depend on armed forces which you no longer
controlled. MI5 and MI6 would no longer be responsible for security in Scotland. Would this make it
more or less likely that terrorists might find a way past our defences? Even if
the rUK and Scottish armed forces and security services were to get on
especially well, and it would clearly be in their interest to do so, we know
from history that the weakest point is always where two allied armies meet.
I would also like to ask my friends in the other
parts of the UK. Do you really want to
lose what must be about a third of your territory? In addition you would lose
who knows what fraction of your coastline. Most British people feel
strongly about our fellow Brits even if they live overseas. We’d fight for Gibraltar. We fought for the Falklands. Yet while you care
about a far away place in the South Atlantic of which you know nothing, many of
you could not care less about the loss of a part of your own country to which
you are joined both physically and with shared ties that stretch back
centuries. Anti-Scottish banter is all very well, but you do realise that you
would be losing a part of Britain forever? Would you be
equally happy to lose Cornwall?
What it amounts to is this. Do you really want a
foreign power north of the border? This foreign power could immediately act in
ways which would be contrary to rUK’s interest. That means contrary to your
interest. This foreign power would be a competitor. It would try to attract
business away from rUK, perhaps by setting rates of corporation tax in such a
way as to attract business away from England, Wales and Northern Ireland, perhaps by making
alliances and deals with other foreign powers. Do you really think that this is
in your own interest?
The nationalists want your hostility. Do you
really want to play into their hands by saying good riddance to your fellow
countrymen, your fellow Brits? They want a disunited UK. That’s why they sow
discord with university tuition fees that only your kids pay. That’s why they
try to treat people from different parts of the UK differently. They want
you to resent any special treatment that is given to us Scots. But most Scots
are not nationalists. We don’t see any real difference between us and our
friends, neighbours and relations in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, beyond a slight
difference in accent. Most of can find an ancestor born where you come from,
even if our surname begins with Mac. The English speaking peoples of this
island are as mixed up as the Italian speaking people of that peninsula. It
makes as much sense to divide us as it would be to divide them.
In the long run we would all lose out by this
division. Who knows when, but there will come a time when we will really need
each other. Wellington famously said that Waterloo was a close run thing.
The battle may have been lost without the Highland divisions standing firm
without the Scots Greys charging shouting “Scotland forever”. Our common
purpose made the difference when it looked for a moment as if the Germans would
win in 1918. Thank God that Scotland was not a foreign power
in 1940 as that would have made the few still fewer. There will come a time no
doubt when you will need us again as we will need you. History has a way of
repeating itself. This is why it is in your interest too that we all follow the
lead of that great man who said “Let us go forward together.”